For informational purposes only. Full disclaimer.
I'm a corporate counsel at a mid-sized company considering a return to firm practice after three years in-house. I've been out of the BigLaw world since my clerkship ended, and I'm honestly not sure what junior associate compensation looks like anymore. I keep hearing about the Cravath scale, but I'm seeing wildly different numbers online. What are first and second-year associates actually making at top firms these days? I'm looking at opportunities in Charlotte and potentially Seattle, so I'm curious if there are regional differences. The equity upside and deal flow at firms is appealing compared to my current role, but I want to make sure the economics make sense.

BigLaw Junior Associate Salaries: Market Data & Trends

Compensation

Quick Answer

BigLaw junior associate salaries follow the Cravath scale, with first-years earning $215,000 and second-years making $235,000 at top firms. Regional markets like Charlotte and Seattle may offer 10-20% adjustments, but cost of living differences often favor these markets.

Share

Dear Thomas V.,

Current BigLaw Junior Associate Compensation Landscape

The legal recruiting market shows junior associate compensation has stabilized around the Cravath scale, which sets the benchmark for Am Law 100 firms nationwide. First-year associates at top-tier firms following the Cravath scale typically earn $215,000, while second-years typically earn around $235,000. However, the market reality is more nuanced than these headline numbers suggest.

Many lateral candidates find that total compensation varies significantly based on geographic market, firm tier, and practice group demand. The Cravath scale calculator provides current market rates, but regional adjustments can shift these numbers substantially.

Regional Market Variations

Charlotte represents one of the fastest-growing legal markets in the Southeast, with major firms like K&L Gates, Moore & Van Allen, and Robinson Bradshaw expanding rapidly. The market shows associate salaries often run below NYC levels, though cost of living advantages can make these positions financially competitive. Bank of America and Wells Fargo headquarters drive massive financial services practices, creating strong demand for junior associates with corporate and regulatory experience.

Seattle's market dynamics differ considerably, with Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta driving corporate and IP practices. Firms typically evaluate candidates based on tech sector experience, and Washington's noncompete restrictions have created employment law opportunities. Perkins Coie and Davis Wright Tremaine lead regional compensation, often matching or approaching Cravath scale numbers for high-demand practice areas.

Practice Area Premium Considerations

Market data reveals certain practice groups command significant premiums above standard associate scales. Privacy and data security laterals may command premiums over base compensation in high-demand markets, while AI and tech transactions groups are expanding at nearly every major firm. The Bay Area market shows particular strength in employment litigation, where California-specific PAGA expertise remains highly valued even following the 2024 PAGA reforms (AB 2288/SB 92).

Corporate practices tied to fintech, energy, and healthcare sectors are showing consistent growth, particularly in emerging markets like Charlotte where lateral demand is outpacing supply. Firms are actively recruiting from DC, Atlanta, and NYC to fill these roles.

Bonus Structure and Total Compensation

Base salary represents only part of the compensation equation for junior associates. Many Am Law 100 firms structure bonuses around billable hour thresholds, often starting around 1,900-2,000 hours (varies by firm) for meaningful bonus consideration. Market intelligence suggests bonus pools have remained relatively stable, with consistent bonus distributions at most firms.

Many firms now offer enhanced benefits packages to compete for junior talent, including expanded parental leave, mental health resources, and technology stipends. These additions can represent significant additional value beyond stated compensation figures.

Making the Economics Work

For attorneys transitioning from in-house roles, the compensation comparison extends beyond pure salary numbers. Firms typically evaluate lateral candidates based on portable experience and client relationships, even at the junior level. Deal flow and equity considerations in private practice often prove more valuable than immediate compensation differences.

Consider that BigLaw partnership tracks, while competitive, offer substantially higher earning potential than most in-house counsel positions. The market shows successful associates often see meaningful annual salary increases through senior levels, with equity partnership representing a significant long-term financial opportunity.

Regional markets like Charlotte and Seattle often provide better work-life integration than traditional BigLaw centers while maintaining competitive compensation. The bar reciprocity requirements vary by state, so verify admission requirements early in your decision process.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or career advice. Content is AI-assisted and reviewed by Fluency Legal staff. See full disclaimer.

Considering a Move?

Fluency Legal places attorneys at top firms — confidentially. No obligation, no pressure.

Start a Conversation →
Stephen Taylor
Fluency Legal | Legal Recruiting

Was this article helpful?

Tags: #biglaw #associate-salary #regional-markets #compensation